An arbitrator cleared the way for Chevron to buy Hess, allowing the energy giant to acquire a portion of one of the most promising oil projects in the world.
Chevron prevailed over Exxon Mobil in a high-stakes court case, clearing the path for Chevron to buy into one of the world’s most valuable oil discoveries.
The verdict by the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce on Friday implies that Chevron can move forward with the acquisition of a smaller rival, Hess, for $53 billion.
It is a big success for America’s second-largest oil business, which is based in Houston and has been waiting nearly two years to consummate this purchase amid mounting investor fears about the company’s future.
In Hess, Chevron receives a share of a rich oil project off the beaches of Guyana, in South America. It also obtains an array of other properties, from North Dakota to Southeast Asia, that will prolong the company’s runway of drilling prospects and give it the potential to better compete with the likes of Exxon, its larger U.S. rival.
Exxon and Chevron have been wrangling over Hess’s share in Guyana for more than a year, at tremendous expense to Chevron. The struggle left the smaller oil firm in limbo, unable to consummate its agreement for Hess — and thus unable to move on.
Chevron’s stock price had suffered, falling approximately 9 percent from when the corporation announced the Hess transaction in October 2023 through Thursday. For Exxon, whose share price climbed less than 1 percent in that time, there was comparatively little to lose.
Chevron’s stock price jumped around 3 percent in premarket trade on Friday, and shares of Hess soared more than 7 percent. Exxon’s shares inched downward.
Exxon said it disagreed with the arbitration panel’s ruling.
“We welcome Chevron to the venture and look forward to continued industry-leading performance and value creation in Guyana for all parties involved,” an Exxon spokesman said in a statement.
Chevron and Hess did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Their quarrel was rooted in the fine text of a contract that has never been made public.
The Guyana development is a partnership between three businesses. Exxon operates the project and maintains the largest interest, followed by Hess and CNOOC, a Chinese state-owned oil corporation. Their project is considered one of the most promising in the world and is projected to single-handedly generate roughly 1 percent of the world’s oil within a few years, according to the International Energy Agency.
Exxon argued Hess couldn’t sell itself without first giving Exxon the opportunity to buy its part in the development. Chevron and Hess contended that Exxon was not interpreting the terms of the collaboration in Guyana correctly.
With the corporations unable to come to an agreement, the fate of the contract was put in the hands of a team of arbitrators who heard the matter behind closed doors in late May. The dispute addressed the three partners in the project, which meant that Chevron was technically not a party to the trial.
The Federal Trade Commission has previously allowed Chevron to buy Hess. Hess shareholders have also approved off on the deal.
Chevron has been preparing for the deal to conclude and is in the middle of a cost-cutting effort that is projected to lower its work force by 15 to 20 percent. That does not include the personnel it will receive from Hess.
Getting the green light to finally conclude the Hess merger provides Chevron impetus during a challenging period for oil and gas companies.
The Trump administration is catering to fossil fuel industries by pulling away restrictions, giving them greater tax incentives and making it more expensive to create alternatives like wind and solar electricity. But President Trump has been very plain that he wishes oil to be cheap, and he is waging a trade war that has helped make it so.
Oil prices have decreased on concerns that stronger trade barriers will hamper economic growth, meaning fewer people flying, driving to work and moving products around the world. Inexpensive energy is excellent for consumers, but bad for oil companies’ business lines.


No comments